Google+

The Trouble with Modulating Compressors

Leave a comment

November 9, 2015 by kaeserusa

By Michael Camber

Trouble_with_Modulating_CompressorsMany plants are still running modulating compressors. For many decades, they were the go-to design choice for compressed air systems. Now they’ve mainly been relegated to warming the bench, mostly due to the rise of variable frequency drive (VFD) compressors. While still numerous, they pose problems—especially in the areas of controls and efficiency. If you have multiple modulation control units in your plant, you just might have the makings of an energy savings jackpot.

Modulation control definitely had its benefits:

  • Steady internal temperature
  • Less starts/stops
  • Less thrust changes
  • Theoretically more stable pressure (but only at compressor discharge)

But, this type of control can bring up the following concerns:

Pressure: Unless the system pressure is controlled from a point downstream and the system has proper storage, neither modulation nor VFD guarantees stable pressure.

Control and power consumption: A single modulation machine running in the ~85 – 100% load range is fine. But, when multiple units are running together or if demand drops, they are more likely to run outside their efficient application range. And they will modulate in an uncoordinated manner.

Internal operating temperature: This is a valid concern, but most new compressors have better thermal controls and are not susceptible to such temperature fluctuations. And of course, VFD’s have inherently good temperature stability also. If the system is properly applied, there would be base load compressors running fully loaded or off, addressing the thermal cycling of these units, with one compressor such as a VFD operating as a trim.

Here’s a great example:

A large manufacturer had four 75 hp units that had been running reliably for 20 years. But all were modulation units with no master controller. The compressors ramped up and down individually, racking up energy bills and causing unnecessary wear and tear on the units. Collectively, their specific power was 62.00 kW/100 cfm. This is obscenely bad energy performance. Current models with modern controls typically have specific power ratings of 18.00 – 20.00 kW/100 cfm. However, without a proper master controller even these compressors may not be able to meet such a specific power. In this case, as in most others, the problem was not so much the age of the compressors or that modulation was used, but that they were all loading without coordination.

When they replaced them with online/offline dual control units, added storage, and a master controller, system specific performance improved to 17.00 kW/100 cfm and pressure was more stable downstream. The energy payback on replacing the four unit system was just over one year.

So if you have more than one modulation compressor, do yourself a favor and get a compressed air energy audit done. You might save yourself a bundle and improve your system efficiency while you’re at it.


Michael_Camber_100x150_March_2017Michael Camber is currently Kaeser’s Marketing Services Manager. He has been in a number of sales, marketing and training roles since joining Kaeser in 1997. Michael is a member of Kaeser’s active training team, educating both Kaeser’s distribution network and customers on reliable and energy efficient compressed air system design.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Have a Question?

%d bloggers like this: